open-solar-design

Solar Street Lights Under Trees

 -- The Split-Array Solution





Solar Street Lights Under Trees: The Split-Array Solution

Solar Street Light Shading Solutions

When a solar street light has to sit under trees, the panel is the problem, not the light — and moving only the panel usually beats moving the fixture. A shaded array undercharges the battery, and chronic undercharge is what shortens battery life; the fixture itself keeps working fine. This page covers why shade costs more than it looks, what a split (separated) installation actually involves in engineering terms, and the decision rule we apply when a client shows us a mature tree over the proposed pole.

Why shade costs more than it looks

A solar module is a series string of cells, and the string's current is the current of its weakest cell. A few shaded cells drag the whole string toward their contribution; if the shade persists, those cells dissipate power as heat — the hot-spot failure mode that eventually kills a module. Bypass diodes limit the damage to the substring they protect, but they do not recover the energy: shade on a handful of cells in a typical three-diode module can cost a third of that module's output.

An MPPT controller helps the system harvest what the array does produce. It cannot un-shade a cell. Evergreen canopies shade year-round, while deciduous shade swings with the leaf cycle — the shoulder months, when generation is already marginal, are when the mismatch bites.

What a split installation actually involves

Separate the array from the fixture: panels in open sun, a cable run to the light. The engineering decisions that make or break it:

  1. Voltage drop over the cable run. DC at battery voltage is lossy over distance. Worked example: a 300 W array charging a 24 V battery pushes about 13 A. Over a 20 m run (40 m of conductor, round trip), keeping the drop under 0.5 V (about 2%) takes roughly 16 mm² of copper. The same run at 12 V needs four times the copper for the same percentage, because the current doubles. That arithmetic, not the marketing, decides how far the array can sit from the light.
  2. Cable spec. UV-rated insulation, direct-burial or in conduit, armored where rodents or mowers reach. An underground run needs the same care as any buried cable: depth, bedding, and a locatable route.
  3. Connections at both ends. This is where split systems fail in the field — not in the wire. IP67 or better enclosures, strain relief at every entry, filled or rated connectors. We spec them like outdoor luminaire connections, because that is what they are.
  4. Earthing and surge protection. Both structures (array frame and light pole) get bonded and earthed per local code. A long outdoor run is an antenna for lightning-induced transients, so a surge protective device at the controller end is standard on our split designs, not an upsell.
  5. The remote array is its own structure. It is a sail on its own mount, sized with the same wind calculation as a pole. Our wind load calculator takes the array area, mounting height, and local wind speed and returns the loads your fabricator needs.

The decision rule we apply

When a shaded site comes in, we work through the options in this order:

  1. Trim or negotiate the vegetation first. It is the cheapest fix by an order of magnitude. Get the commitment in writing, because an unwritten trimming promise dies with the first grounds-keeping contract change.
  2. If the shade is permanent, price both options: relocate the fixture to sun, or split the array. Split wins when road geometry fixes where the light must stand and the run is short. Relocation wins when open sun sits close by and trenching is expensive.
  3. Consider a taller array mast before trenching. Sometimes a 4–5 m mast lifts the panels above the shade line entirely, which is often cheaper than a cable run plus its civil work.

What the split saves — honestly

The upfront cost is the survey, the trenching or conduit, the cable, and junction work at both ends. The return is not footfall or civic image; it is battery life and avoided service calls. A chronically undercharged LiFePO4 battery (lithium iron phosphate, the chemistry we use for its cycle life) loses usable capacity years early, and the replacement visit costs more than the cable did. The split pays for itself when it turns a two-to-three-year battery replacement cycle into the five-plus years the cells are capable of. That is the entire business case, and it is enough.

What this page does not cover

This page covers DC-coupled split-array designs for solar street lights, where the array charges the fixture's battery over a dedicated DC run. It does not cover AC-fed lighting circuits, hybrid grid/solar fixtures, or projects where the fixture itself moves — a relocation is a photometric redesign, not a wiring job. For the controller and battery envelope for a split design, our controller sizing calculator takes the array, run length, and autonomy target; our all-in-one solar street light line shows the integrated alternative that the split is measured against.